Uniserve Communications Corp. v. Schmidt, [2013] C.L.A.D. No. 344

Our client, CEO of Uniserve, made a successful claim under the Canada Labour Code for termination and severance pay on the grounds that the monies he received from his employer following his dismissal were for subsequent consulting work and did not represent the amounts owed to him under the Code. The employer appealed this award and the Referee appointed by the Minister of Labour to consider the appeal upheld the original decision in our client’s favour.

Click here to read Uniserve v. Schmidt


NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on the Kent Employment Law website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action, based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. One of our lawyers would be pleased to discuss any specific legal concerns you may have.

Facebooktwitterlinkedin