Jordon v. Pacific Sign Group Inc. et al, [2007] BCSC Docket No. S066820

Court found that a restrictive covenant in his employment contract prohibiting Mr. Jordon from competing against the defendants after he left their employ was unreasonable and unfair and went farther than necessary to protect the defendants’ customer base and prevent the misuse of trade secrets. The covenant was declared unenforceable.

Solomon v. Alexis Creek Indian Band, 2007 BCSC 459

Successful claim for wrongful dismissal by the plaintiff after 2 years of employment as the head-start / health coordinator of the defendant Indian Band. Court concluded that a notice period of five months was appropriate and awarded three additional months because the Band acted in an out-of-control and high-handed manner in dismissing her.

Kehoe v. Fields BC Company dba “The BMW Store”, 2006, S062371

Successful claim by employee offered inadequate severance. Court awarded 9 months notice to a service manager of a BMW dealership with 8.5 years service.

Perkins v. Shuen et al., 2006 BCSC 121

Court awarded 12 months notice to a dental assistant with 24 years of employment who was fired by the defendants approximately 6 months after they purchased her former employer’s dental practice.

Danroth v. Farrow Holdings Ltd., [2005] BCCA 593

Court held that the employee’s resignation had not been clear and unequivocal and that his conduct was inconsistent with an intention to resign and awarded the employee 6 months severance.

Danroth v. Farrow Holdings Ltd., 2005 BCSC 637

In this case, the BC Supreme Court found that our client’s statement to his employer that he had been constructively dismissed amounted to a resignation. Our client appealed this decision to the BC Court of Appeal and was successful in having the lower court’s decision overturned.

Nicholson v. Sight, Sound & Action Ltd., S040514, May 21, 2004

The employer in this case was required to pay our client, a theatre producer, all the monies owed to her under her employment contract after the Court rejected the employer’s claim that she was dismissed for cause.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on the Kent Employment Law website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action, based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. One of our lawyers would be pleased to discuss any specific legal concerns you may have.