Philps v. Ritchie-Smith Feeds and another, 2017 BCHRT 67

Our client filed a discrimination complaint with the BC Human Rights Tribunal against his former employer and union.  The employer subsequently asserted that the matter fell within federal jurisdiction and should be heard by the Canadian Human Rights Commission.  Out of an abundance of caution, we did not withdraw our client’s provincial complaint until the Commission accepted jurisdiction of the complaint.  In response, the employer applied to the Tribunal for costs against our client, alleging improper conduct.

We successfully argued for a dismissal of the employer’s cost application.  Finding in our client’s favour, the provincial Tribunal held that the steps taken were done in good faith to safeguard our client’s interests and did not warrant costs.

Click here to read the decision in Philps.

The latest insights

Read more

Bus company’s vax policy reasonable despite lifting of public health restrictions

Read more

Read more

For Cause Dismissals: What Behaviour Will Get You Fired Without Severance Pay?

Read more

Read more

Non-Competition Agreements: Are They Enforceable?

Read more
×

Sign-up for our Newsletter

Want current, relevant updates on issues that matter to your workplace? Sign up to receive our monthly e-newsletter!

[ Sign-up for the eNewsletter ]